Memahami Hambatan Keterbukaan Diri Klien Rehabilitasi Narkotika: Perspektif Teori Atribusi Staf Rehabilitasi (Understanding Barriers to Self-Disclosure among Drug Rehabilitation Clients: An Attribution Theory Perspective of Rehabilitation Staff)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30762/happiness.v10i1.3689Keywords:
attribution, self-disclosure, drug rehabilitationAbstract
This study aims to analyze rehabilitation staff attributions regarding barriers to client self-disclosure during the drug rehabilitation process at the National Narcotics Agency (BNN) of Kediri City. Self-disclosure is a crucial element in addiction counseling because it serves as the basis for assessing clients’ psychological conditions, substance-use history, and planning appropriate interventions. However, clients often experience difficulties in disclosing personal information, such as withholding important information, providing inaccurate responses, and avoiding counseling sessions. These barriers occur among both compulsory and voluntary clients, although they manifest in different forms. This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach involving two rehabilitation staff members selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and observations of staff–client interactions. Data analysis consisted of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing, while data validity was ensured through source and technique triangulation. The findings indicate that rehabilitation staff construct both internal and external attributions in understanding barriers to client self-disclosure. Internal attributions relate to clients’ motivation, readiness for recovery, and coping abilities, whereas external attributions involve social stigma, environmental pressures, concerns regarding legal status, and unstable psychological conditions. These attributions influence the support strategies employed, including humanistic approaches, creating informal counseling settings, maintaining client privacy, and coordinating across services. The findings highlight the important role of staff attributions in fostering effective therapeutic relationships and supporting successful rehabilitation outcomes.
Downloads
References
Bari, R., Mitchell, S. G., & Gryczynski, J. (t.t.). Inter-agency information sharing and continuity of care in substance use disorder treatment. 2024, 19(1), 34-45.
Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (2018). Psikologi sosial (15 ed.). Jakarta: Erlangga.
Chen, L., & Wang, Q.. (2021). Trust issues in compulsory drug treatment. 19(4).
Greene, M. C., Kane, J. C., & Tol, W. A. (2022). De-institutionalizing addiction care: The impact of low-threshold, non-formal settings on client self-disclosure. Harm Reduction Journal, 19(3), 88–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-022-00671-5
Hidayati, F. (2021). Self-disclosure dalam konseling adiksi. Jurnal Psikologi Klinis Indonesia, 10(2), 112–120.
Jourard, S. M. (1971). Self-disclosure: An experimental analysis of the transparent self.
Koo, K. H., Sullivan, S., & Ward, S. (2020). Extrinsic versus intrinsic readiness: How addiction counselors attribute clients’ ambivalence and self-disclosure. 112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108012
Matusow, H., Goldstein, M. F., & Rosenblum, A. (2023). Institutional demands and attribution errors among rehabilitation staff: A qualitative inquiry. International Journal of Drug Policy, 115, 103–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.103980
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3 ed.).
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2012). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi).
Polres Kediri Kota tangani 141 orang yang terjerat kasus narkoba. (2025, Januari 2). radar kediri. https://radarkediri.jawapos.com/hukum-kriminal/785482479/polres-kediri-kota-tangani-141-orang-yang-terjerat-kasus-narkoba
Radcliffe, P., & Stevens, A. (2021). Protective secrecy’ and drug use: Stigma, self-disclosure, and the social identity of recovery. Sociology of Health & Illness, 43(6), 1422–1438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13322
Rahmawati, I. (2022). Pengantar psikologi sosial. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sari, I., & Lestari, Y. (2024). The effectiveness of flexible counseling environment in drug rehabilitation. Indonesian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 12(1), 10-25.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D.
Supriyadi, A., & Puspita, D. (2021). Akurasi diagnosis dalam konseling adiksi. Jurnal Konseling Indonesia, 6(1).
Urbanoski, K. A. (2010). Coerced addiction treatment: Client perspectives and the implications of their neglect. Harm Reduction Journal, 7(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-7-13
Urbanoski, K. A. (2020). Coerced addiction treatment and the mechanics of trust: Implications for compulsory and voluntary client outcomes. Addictive Behaviors, 104, 1106–1117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106275
Wibowo, R., & Hadi, S. (2022). Denial and blocking mechanism in drug rehabilitation clients. 3(2).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Laila Qodriatul Fitri, Yuli Darwati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

















